Date: 22.11.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 672
Essaywrite.bitrixtemplates.com #Ethics: argumentative essay

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Ethics: argumentative essay

Ethics: argumentative essay

Mar/Fri/2018 | Uncategorized




Ethics Paper Outline Part I


Video to create the first part of your outline for the Ethics paper. This video screencast was created with Doceri on an iPad. Doceri is

Sample guidelines for writing ethical arguments - Sacred Heart

Ethics: argumentative essay

Buy Essay Papers Here -
The Top 15 Best Ethical Essay Topics You Should Discuss

Beowulf Comparison to Modern Day Hero. From Beowulf to Superman, Why we need our Heroes Heroes, from Beowulf to Superman our cultures have always created heroes. Ethics: Argumentative Essay! We may always have political, social, economic and religious differences, but at the end of the day we all have one thing in common, heroes. They help define who we are and what we want to be. Crossing Ruben! They give us hope and argumentative essay, inspire us to head in the right direction. They show us that good will always triumph over evil and good for essays, that anything is possible if you set your mind to it.

Heroes give us the inspiration we need to overcome problems in our own lives and that is why we create them. Beowulf perfectly embodies the Ethics: argumentative essay idea of a hero. He defeats the evil Grendel and his mother, slays the dragon and saves his people. He is strong, brave, moral, inspiring; all of which are traits that some one can look up to research topics, and while his story may have been written over a thousand years ago, Beowulf’s heroism has echoed through the ages. Even today, our heroes are strong, brave, moral and inspiring. Need essay sample on Beowulf Comparison to Modern Day Hero ? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page.

In a way, one could say Beowulf was the hero of hero’s not only inspiring the people of his time, but inspiring the heroes who would later be created in his image. Beowulf begins as many epic tales do, by introducing the hero. The author tells the Ethics: reader of how Beowulf has trekked oceans and handling coursework, slain monsters; right from the beginning it is made obvious that Beowulf is no ordinary man. However, with any tale, the hero must have an adversary, an evil that must be overcome. Ethics: Argumentative Essay! In Beowulf’s case, he has three, the hideous monster Grendel, Grendel’s mother and the foreboding Dragon. So while there may be three physical antagonists, one can argue that they metaphorically represent one thing, the personification of societies shortcomings. In John Gardner’s “Grendel”, the religious research paper topics monster is said to Ethics: argumentative, harbor feelings of lust or jealousy of the inhabitants of Hrothgar’s mead-hall and attacks them due to his feeling of exclusion. The story also alludes to the idea of wrath or vengeance. After Beowulf kills Grendel, Grendel’s mother seeks revenge for her fallen son by attacking the mead-hall. Grendel’s mother is not the on lord flies nature only character who seeks vengeance. In fact, the hero, Beowulf, also makes reference to revenge after Grendel’s mother kills Aeschere, Hrothgar’s advisor.

He tells Hrothgar, Wise sir, do not grieve. It is always betterto avenge dear ones than to Ethics: argumentative, indulge in crossing martinez, mourning. Essay! For every one of us, living in this worldmeans waiting for our end. Handling Gcse Coursework! Let whoever canwin glory before death. When a warrior is gone,that will be his best and only bulwark. (1384-1389) It is ironic that Grendel’s mother would represent vengeance because as Beowulf himself says, “it is better to argumentative, avenge dear ones than to mourn them. ” This brings up an research, interesting point because it is difficult to tell what exactly the author was trying to say. He or she may have been trying to Ethics: argumentative, speak to the morals of the time in saying that no one is above vengeance, even the great hero Beowulf or they may have been speaking to and contrast essay poetry, the inherently self-deprecating act that the endless cycle of argumentative essay revenge would cause. The other two monsters represent sins, there is no reason that Grendel’s mother should be excluded from this fact. If the author was trying to speak to the heroes struggle against religious paper societies issues, then wrath would have to be considered a problem, not a solution.

Finally, there is the Dragon, whom Beowulf fights as an older king. Argumentative! The Dragon represents many things, Beowulf’s impending death, his final challenge, his passing of the compare essay torch to essay, the younger generation, but when trying to convey this final antagonist to economics topics for extended essay, modern day problems, the Dragon can only represent one thing, greed. Stories have always depicted dragon’s as greedy, and Beowulf’s dragon is no different. The story describes it as, “an old harrower of the dark…the burning one who hunts out barrows,” the Dragon hoards gold, which represents greed. So, Beowulf, the hero, with his super-human strength and unrivaled courage must defeat three monsters or three sins, jealousy, with Grendel, wrath, with Grendal’s mother and greed, with the Dragon. These are three of the bible’s seven deadly sins that are ingrained in our society. Sins that our heroes are still fighting today. Popular heroes like Superman, Iron Man and Batman, all seemingly fight villains who represent some moral turpitude. However, what is really interesting about these heroes is how closely they resemble a character a thousand years older than them, Beowulf. If heroes are supposed to represent what we as people want to be morally, then it would make sense that they would also represent what we want to be physically. Argumentative! Look at essays on lord flies nature how Beowulf is argumentative depicted physically.

He is a strong, statuesque man who seemingly towers over essay ruben martinez his peers. At the time, that is most likely what every man wanted to Ethics: argumentative, be. Now look at our heroes today. For example, Batman, who is a tall, handsome, millionaire bachelor who drives nice cars and dates beautiful women. The same can be said for heroes like Superman, Iron-man, Captain America and essays on lord flies nature, most other well-known heroes, but in order to Ethics: argumentative essay, fight crime, the heroes do not need these things. This point speaks to the fact that not only do our heroes reassure our moral standings they also embody the physical epitome of what we wish to good clinchers for essays, be.

While the Ethics: argumentative essay physical nature of topics for extended essay our heroes excites us, it is Ethics: argumentative essay their actions that we gravitate towards. Economics Topics! The premise of the first section of Beowulf is the hero bringing order and stability to a chaotic Heorot. This is similar to our heroes today, where Superman and Batman would represent Beowulf, Batman’s Gotham City and Superman’s Metropolis would represent their own Heorots; they too, must bring order and stability to these places. Gotham City, Metropolis, Heorot, these places can all be seen as metaphors for their representative cultures. These places are all plagued by “villains” or societal problems, and must be defeated by the personification of our values or “heroes”. So heroes represent the protectors of Ethics: argumentative essay our values, but we already have those in real life. That is, policeman and government officials and in Beowulf’s time that would be kings and queens.

What is so astonishing about our heroes, is that they are rarely any of these things. When Beowulf defeated Grendel, he was not a king or a man that enforced law and modern heroes are almost never policeman or government officials. It is a strange concept to think about, but there is essays on lord flies nature a reason for this; societies do not believe that real life law enforcers represent their core values. While these entities are necessary in keeping order, they seem to be bogged down by complications and bureaucratic bias or at argumentative essay least viewed that way and this opinion of them has seemingly been present for on lord flies, a very long time. In Beowulf, Hrothgar, the king, has to call Beowulf for help, but Hrothgar is the governing entity, he should be able to handle the evil Grendel by Ethics: himself. In Gotham City, Batman works hand in hand with Gotham’s police commissioner, James Gordon. Religious Research Paper! However, it is argumentative essay not Gordon who is defeating the good “bad guys”, it is Batman.

Even some one like James Bond has, “a license to kill. ” The heroes we create are seemingly above the law. While they vow to argumentative, protect the innocent and instill justice they do not necessarily abide by handling coursework the set laws of society. So technically, they could be called criminals, but we still see them as a morally outstanding. This is an idea psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg coined as post-conventional morals. Argumentative Essay! It is the idea that people live by research paper their own ethical principals, ideas that usually include basic human rights such as life, liberty and justice. The belief that stealing to support your starving family takes precedence over the fact that stealing is illegal. Right or wrong, it is a principle that our heroes live by. So if we can accept the fact that most people live by their own core of principles then another point arises. It is an idea highlighted in psychologists Zeno Franco and Ethics: essay, Phillip Zimbardo’s study, “The Banality of essays on lord of the flies nature Heroism”.

In this study, they argued that we are all potential heroes just waiting for our moment to essay, shine. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, says that the word “Hero” originates from the Greek word that means “protector” or “defender”. We all will have a chance to “protect” or “defend” some one or something, it is not an action exclusive to law enforcement. Think about the on lord human heroic first responders to the multiple tragedies we have endured, or the father who gives his child a kidney or the person who donates blood at every opportunity. These acts of heroism, no matter the scale, are something people have always done for each other.

Heroism is Ethics: essay a universal attribute and clinchers for essays, is something that is in the range of possibilities for every person, inspiring more us to answer that call. So it is sort of Ethics: essay a “chicken or the egg”, self-creating loop where real life heroes inspire the stories of our fictional leaders, and these fictional stories at handling data coursework the same time inspire real life acts of heroism. That is the Ethics: argumentative essay reason we grow so attached to our heroes. Not only do we read about them in the fiction we create, we read about them on essays on lord flies, the news as well. Essay! Superman, Batman, Beowulf, these are all heroes that were inspired by the heroism we see everyday. The similarities between our modern heroes and Beowulf are apparent. Of The! It is extraordinary how even a thousand years has not changed the way we see our heroes and it makes one believe that a thousand years from Ethics: argumentative now our heroes will remain the same. Of The Human Nature! However, there is a difference between Beowulf and his modern day counterparts and it is something that speaks to Ethics: argumentative, the differences in our cultures. In the Anatomy of Criticism author Northrop Frye highlights the five types of hero. Flies Nature! Most of our heroes fall under the first three types and Beowulf falls under the second.

The heroes are classified by their, “power of action, which may be greater than ours, less than ours or the argumentative same. ” With type one the hero is presented as divine, above both man and their environment, heroes like Superman would fall under this category, for we can never replicate what they are able to do. Crossing Martinez! Type two says that the hero is still above most ordinary men, but is Ethics: argumentative only slightly above the restrictions of the environment, these heroes can bleed and even be defeated. Heroes that fall under this category are Batman, Iron Man and essay ruben, Beowulf. It is these type two heroes that seem to draw the most fascination because they balance between the argumentative delicate line of divinity and humanity. They are created just above the reach of men. While we know we can never actually be Batman, Iron Man or Beowulf, they still are close enough to us to give them a sense a vulnerability, but again, there is a difference between them.

While Batman and on lord flies human nature, Beowulf are both type two heroes one of them grows old and inevitably dies while the other seemingly never ages. Essay! This is the handling data coursework major difference between our heroes today and argumentative essay, Beowulf; it is the key difference between our culture today and the culture of Beowulf’s creators. Crossing Ruben! Throughout the Ethics: essay story Beowulf is constantly making references to death’s lurking presence while Batman comes out year after year not having aged a day. In a time where everyone had to be ready to fight and die it was natural to human, create a hero who himself had to argumentative essay, be weary of death. Back then, that is what people worried about, dying in war and accepting one’s fate. Today, while we are still constantly at war, not everyone has to physically fight. In an age where medicine can extends one life to over one hundred years, death is not always our biggest concern. Most people, at a young age, feel invincible and our heroes reflect this idea of immortality. However, the fact still remains, that no matter how different the culture, even cultures a thousand years apart, we still create heroes.

Our cultures need heroes. They offer us so much. They give us hope, inspiration, and are a model for how one should live their own life. They give us all of these things and more, but perhaps the and contrast poetry most important thing. they offer us is an escape. Life is Ethics: argumentative essay hard and it has always been hard. Whether people are dealing with debt, death, love, hate, war, racism, health, success or any other challenge we have always had to face, life can be difficult.

So these heroes offer a temporary escape from all of the challenges we endure and at the same time they are giving us relief, they are inspiring us to overcome these challenges. That is economics for extended why heroes are timeless. From Beowulf to Superman, we have always looked up to our heroes, and that is essay why we need them.

Buy Essay Online -
Sample guidelines for writing ethical arguments - Sacred Heart

New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. Plugin. You can use it to build a subset of interdependent projects in Ethics: argumentative, a. reactor. It should be useful in handling data gcse, large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend.

on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the argumentative essay, plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is on lord of the handy. for debugging and exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. Essay! myfile.xml): download the and contrast, deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. year (but didn't implement yet): 3.0 and we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to Ethics: argumentative cut it from. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Good For Essays! not sure where the current one came from), this would. be perfect to fit in Ethics: argumentative essay, as a new feature.

I don't want the new 2.1.0 to. grow into a monster so for example we could implement this and release. it, then we could add the parallel download and release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the Maven Reactor. Plugin. Handling Data Gcse! You can use it to Ethics: build a subset of interdependent projects in.

reactor. Topics For Extended! It should be useful in argumentative, large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend. on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is.

for debugging and handling gcse exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. myfile.xml): download the deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. makeDependents and resume parts of this into core, though there's two. perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an official Apache Maven. plugin. (Though I did already add the Apache license text to all of the.

2.1.x, who can benefit from this plugin today. that it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin. makeMyChanges queries SCM to find changed files; rolling it into core. would require core to depend on maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't. right now. ) to determine what has changed. Where would *that* go? year (but didn't implement yet): 3.0 and we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to cut it from. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Ethics: Essay! not sure where the current one came from), this would.

be perfect to fit in as a new feature. I don't want the new 2.1.0 to. grow into a monster so for example we could implement this and release. it, then we could add the parallel download and release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM.

To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in gcse, a new plugin to the sandbox called the argumentative, Maven Reactor. Plugin. You can use it to build a subset of essay interdependent projects in. reactor. It should be useful in argumentative, large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar.

that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend. on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is.

for debugging and exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. myfile.xml): download the essays on lord of the flies, deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org.

For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. makeScmChanges. Ethics: Argumentative! This clarifies the purpose of the crossing, goal a bit more. along two tracks. out of sandbox and officially released so Maven 2.0.x users can begin.

using it immediately. I've added my own proposal to Brian's proposal here (pasted below): even if we intend to incorporate its functionality in the future into the. reactor:makeDependents into core. Ethics:! I'm thinking it would go something like. * -pl --project-list: Build the specified reactor projects instead of. * -am --also-make: If a project list is specified, also make projects. that the list depends on. * -amd --also-make-dependents: If a project list is specified, also. make projects that depend on essay ruben, projects on the list. * make: mvn -am -pl ui/a-ui,ui/b-ui. * makeDependents: mvn -amd -pl packages/a-package,packages/b-package.

because that would require maven-core to depend on maven-scm. makeDependents and resume parts of Ethics: argumentative this into core, though there's two. perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an official Apache Maven. plugin. Good Clinchers! (Though I did already add the Ethics: essay, Apache license text to all of the. who can benefit from topics, this plugin today.

it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin. makeMyChanges queries SCM to find changed files; rolling it into core would. require core to depend on maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't right. now. Ethics: Argumentative Essay! ) to determine what has changed. Where would *that* go?

year (but didn't implement yet): 3.0 and economics topics for extended we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to essay cut it from. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Compare Poetry! not sure where the current one came from), this would. be perfect to fit in as a new feature. I don't want the Ethics: essay, new 2.1.0 to. grow into a monster so for compare, example we could implement this and release. it, then we could add the parallel download and release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich.

Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the Maven Reactor. Plugin. You can use it to Ethics: argumentative build a subset of crossing ruben interdependent projects in. reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include.

irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend. on your changes.

Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is. for debugging and Ethics: exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. Handling Coursework! myfile.xml): download the deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org.

For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. makeScmChanges. Ethics:! This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more. pain ;) As far as i know, no other plugin uses camel-case goal names. Wouldn't it be more consistent to name them make-my-changes and. problem along two tracks. graduated out of sandbox and officially released so Maven 2.0.x users. can begin using it immediately. branch: I've added my own proposal to Brian's proposal here (pasted. asap even if we intend to essay incorporate its functionality in the future. reactor:makeDependents into core.

I'm thinking it would go something. * -pl --project-list: Build the specified reactor projects instead. of all projects. * -am --also-make: If a project list is specified, also make. projects that the list depends on. * -amd --also-make-dependents: If a project list is Ethics: specified, also make projects that depend on projects on the list.

* make: mvn -am -pl ui/a-ui,ui/b-ui. * makeDependents: mvn -amd -pl packages/a-package,packages/b-package. reactor:makeScmChanges because that would require maven-core to depend. makeDependents and data gcse coursework resume parts of Ethics: essay this into core, though there's. two caveats here: that, perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an of the flies human official.

Apache Maven plugin. Argumentative Essay! (Though I did already add the Apache license. text to crossing essay all of the source files. ) 2.1.x, who can benefit from this plugin today. thought that it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin. makeMyChanges queries SCM to find changed files; rolling it into core. would require core to argumentative depend on clinchers for essays, maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't.

right now. ) to Ethics: argumentative essay determine what has changed. plugin. Where would *that* go? year (but didn't implement yet): 3.0 and we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to religious cut it from. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Ethics:! not sure where the economics topics for extended essay, current one came from), this would. be perfect to essay fit in as a new feature. I don't want the new 2.1.0 to. grow into a monster so for example we could implement this and clinchers release. it, then we could add the parallel download and release as 2.2 etc.

From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the Maven Reactor. Plugin. You can use it to Ethics: argumentative essay build a subset of interdependent. reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar.

Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and essays on lord flies human all reactor projects that depend. on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is.

for debugging and exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. myfile.xml): download the deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org.

For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. ;) As far as i know, no other plugin uses camel-case goal names. Wouldn't it. be more consistent to name them make-my-changes and make-scm-changes ? To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. At the suggestion of others I've renamed the makeMyChanges goal to. makeScmChanges.

This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more. along two tracks. out of sandbox and argumentative officially released so Maven 2.0.x users can begin using. added my own proposal to Brian's proposal here (pasted below): if we intend to incorporate its functionality in the future into nature the core? around the corner yet, so I think having the argumentative essay, fuctionality now is. beneficial for essays on lord of the flies human nature, maven users in general. reactor:makeDependents into core.

I'm thinking it would go something like. * -pl --project-list: Build the argumentative, specified reactor projects instead of all. * -am --also-make: If a project list is good specified, also make projects. that the list depends on. * -amd --also-make-dependents: If a project list is argumentative specified, also make. projects that depend on projects on the list. * make: mvn -am -pl ui/a-ui,ui/b-ui. * makeDependents: mvn -amd -pl packages/a-package,packages/b-package.

because that would require maven-core to depend on maven-scm. makeDependents and resume parts of this into clinchers core, though there's two. perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an official Apache Maven. plugin. Ethics:! (Though I did already add the flies human, Apache license text to all of argumentative the. 2.1.x, who can benefit from crossing essay, this plugin today. that it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin. makeMyChanges queries SCM to find changed files; rolling it into Ethics: argumentative core would. require core to depend on gcse coursework, maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't right. now. ) to determine what has changed. Where would *that* go? year (but didn't implement yet):

3.0 and we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to cut it from. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Essay! not sure where the current one came from), this would. be perfect to fit in economics topics, as a new feature. I don't want the new 2.1.0 to. grow into essay a monster so for example we could implement this and release. it, then we could add the clinchers, parallel download and argumentative release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the research paper topics, Maven Reactor.

Plugin. You can use it to argumentative essay build a subset of interdependent projects in. reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar.

that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend. on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges.

what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. (This is. for debugging and compare exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to Ethics: do this. file (e.g. Crossing Essay Ruben! myfile.xml): download the deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. around the corner yet, so I think having the Ethics: argumentative, fuctionality now is. beneficial for maven users in general. so we can cut the branch. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org.

For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. At the suggestion of others I've renamed the for essays, makeMyChanges goal to. makeScmChanges. This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more. along two tracks. out of sandbox and officially released so Maven 2.0.x users can.

added my own proposal to Brian's proposal here (pasted below): if we intend to incorporate its functionality in the future into. around the Ethics: essay, corner yet, so I think having the good clinchers for essays, fuctionality now is. beneficial for maven users in general. refactoring is Ethics: argumentative essay done. reactor:makeDependents into core. I'm thinking it would go.

* -pl --project-list: Build the essays on lord flies human nature, specified reactor projects. * -am --also-make: If a project list is argumentative specified, also make. that the list depends on. * -amd --also-make-dependents: If a project list is specified, projects that depend on good, projects on the list. * make: mvn -am -pl ui/a-ui,ui/b-ui. * makeDependents: mvn -amd -pl packages/a-package,packages/b- because that would require maven-core to depend on argumentative essay, maven-scm.

makeDependents and resume parts of this into core, though. perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an official Apache. plugin. Compare And Contrast Poetry! (Though I did already add the Apache license text to all. 2.1.x, who can benefit from this plugin today. that it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin. makeMyChanges queries SCM to find changed files; rolling it into.

require core to depend on maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't. now. Essay! ) to determine what has changed. Where would *that* go? year (but didn't implement yet): 3.0 and crossing essay ruben martinez we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to cut it. 2.0.10 or 2.0.9. not sure where the current one came from), this.

be perfect to Ethics: fit in as a new feature. I don't want the new 2.1.0. grow into religious research a monster so for example we could implement this and. it, then we could add the parallel download and essay release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to on lord nature the sandbox called the Maven. Plugin. You can use it to Ethics: essay build a subset of interdependent.

reactor. It should be useful in economics topics, large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to Ethics: SCM) and compare and contrast essay poetry all reactor projects that. on your changes. Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges.

what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. Ethics:! (This. for debugging and exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do. file (e.g. myfile.xml): download the deployed snapshot into your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. Founder, Apache Maven. jason at sonatype dot com. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. I wouldn't try folding it into 3.x until the essay, project builder. refactoring is done. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. Iprofs BV.

Claus Sluterweg 125 2012 WS Haarlem www.iprofs.nl. will it always execute install? Claus Sluterweg 125. 2012 WS Haarlem. makeScmChanges. Argumentative! This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more. along two tracks. out of sandbox and data coursework officially released so Maven 2.0.x users can begin using. I've added my own proposal to Brian's proposal here (pasted below): even if we intend to incorporate its functionality in the future into the. reactor:makeDependents into core. I'm thinking it would go something like.

* -pl --project-list: Build the specified reactor projects instead of. * -am --also-make: If a project list is specified, also make projects. that the list depends on. * -amd --also-make-dependents: If a project list is specified, also make. projects that depend on projects on the list.

* make: mvn -am -pl ui/a-ui,ui/b-ui. * makeDependents: mvn -amd -pl packages/a-package,packages/b-package. because that would require maven-core to depend on maven-scm. makeDependents and essay resume parts of this into core, though there's two. perhaps as a mojo.codehaus.org plugin if not as an official Apache Maven. plugin. (Though I did already add the and contrast essay, Apache license text to all of the. 2.1.x, who can benefit from Ethics:, this plugin today. that it couldn't/shouldn't be done as a plugin.

makeMyChanges queries SCM to handling data gcse coursework find changed files; rolling it into core would. require core to depend on maven-scm (which, I think, it doesn't right. now. ) to determine what has changed. Where would *that* go? 3.0 and Ethics: we will have a new 2.1 branch (when we decide to cut it from.

2.0.10 or 2.0.9. Research! not sure where the current one came from), this would. be perfect to fit in as a new feature. I don't want the Ethics: essay, new 2.1.0 to. grow into a monster so for example we could implement this and release. it, then we could add the parallel download and release as 2.2 etc. From: Dan Fabulich. Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:38 PM. To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List. Subject: New sandbox plugin: maven-reactor-plugin. I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the Maven Reactor.

Plugin. You can use it to build a subset of interdependent projects in. reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. that depend on compare essay, X. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar. foo,bar,baz whereas :makeDependents will build foo,bar,quz) have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend. on your changes.

Example: mvn reactor:makeMyChanges. what the plugin would have done without actually doing it. Ethics: Argumentative! (This is. for debugging and clinchers for essays exploration.) or that there may already be some clever command line tool to do this. file (e.g. myfile.xml): download the Ethics: argumentative essay, deployed snapshot into and contrast poetry your local repository. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org.

For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. will it always execute install? mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=barBusinessLogic -Dmake.goals=clean,package. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org. For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org. Plugin. You can use it to build a subset of interdependent projects in Ethics:, a. reactor. It should be useful in compare essay poetry, large reactor builds that include. irrelevant stuff you're not working on. Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar.

make.modules to keep it consistent with the Ethics: argumentative, same concept in multi-module. web-services depends on security and compare and contrast business-logic. business-logic depends on Ethics: essay, mail and good preferences. Will this figure out that web-services, security, business-logic, mail, and preferences need to be built and do that? do they have to be run at the root-project? you know if there's any problems. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. Any liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from Ethics: argumentative essay, acting, on any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy the original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Copyright in poetry, this e-mail and any attachments belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities.

make.modules to Ethics: keep it consistent with the same concept in handling data gcse coursework, multi-module. names or artifact names with make.artifacts. Yes, see the example at Ethics: essay the end of the page linked above. Then run at of the flies human root-project: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=web-services . Will this figure out argumentative, that web-services, security, business-logic, mail, and preferences need to be built and essay ruben do that? Yup. As well can these commands be invoked from within one of the modules or. do they have to argumentative essay be run at the root-project?

place where we have enough information to economics topics construct a reactor.

Buy Essay Online Cheap -
Ethical Argument Essay Topics for Students | ThePensters com

Advert Analysis : Seat Ibiza, Fiat Punto and Lexus Motors. In this essay I will be looking at three adverts promoting the purchase of cars. I believe that all of these adverts appeal to a niche audience, the argumentative essay, prospective car buyer, as they are unlikely to stimulate an impulse purchase. The first advert I looked at was for Fiat Punto. The first shot you see is a long shot, which shows a very dirty car driving away from a volcano, which is erupting, the and contrast essay poetry, background sounds confirm this. The car appears to be travelling at a great speed. Argumentative. They are driving down a winding mountain road. The situation they are in is extremely unrealistic.

The mountain has lava flowing down it. Compare. All of the colours are grey apart from the lava flow, which is a vivid or. Need essay sample on Advert Analysis : Seat Ibiza, Fiat Punto and Lexus Motors ? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $13.90/page. . ange. A front shot of the car shows the viewer that there are two indistinguishable silhouettes in the car. The volcano is erupting violently and the driver is showing some very skilful cornering to avoid falling debris.

At the climax of the Ethics:, advert when the sky behind the car is completely grey, the car stops and a man and crossing essay ruben woman get out from the car, the woman from the driving side. She shouts at the man, over the noise, #8220;Right, if you can do any better, you drive. #8221; They change sides, the man gets in and the car drives off. The Fiat logo and website address are then displayed. In the background you hear the Ethics:, man blame the woman for getting the car dirty. Compare And Contrast Essay. This advert is aimed at couples wishing to buy a car. Argumentative Essay. They would be able to empathise with the two people, and have probably said the exact words to their partners before. Data Coursework. When watching the advert, as a viewer you are surprised that the Ethics: argumentative, woman is driving, as it is not the stereotypical image. This is paper topics, very clever and increases the argumentative, appeal of the product immensely. It is a complete role reversal and this adds an element of shock when you are watching.

The closing on screen caption #8220;A safe car in a Dangerous world,#8221; is applied to the advert, but also to everyday life. It suggests that whatever is going on outside the essay, car, you will be safe inside. It does not back up this statement by argumentative essay listing any safety features, but instead shows them by the quality of on lord flies human nature, turning and control. Ethics: Essay. To improve this advert the topics for extended essay, two people could look like they are being chased by a volcano, as when they leave the car they are both very smartly dressed and look very well groomed. Also the website address didn#8217;t catch my eye and I only noticed it on a second viewing. There is nothing in Ethics: essay the advert, which is likely to cause offence to any one of any age, race or sex instead quite the opposite. I think women will be very happy to see this and it is a very feel good advert.

The second advert I looked at was for the Seat Ibiza. It opens with a shot of a man driving a car through an old castle. It all looks quite medieval. It swerves to avoid a piece of garlic, which had fallen off the back of a horse drawn carriage. It goes into human slow motion when it skids to avoid the garlic. The music is very gothic and argumentative essay peaks when the handling gcse, film slows down.

The next shots are all from quite a distance showing the car driving through some hilly countryside. As he turns the corner there is a spinning crossroads road sign, which he power slides round. You then see a close up shot of his face, which looks extremely worried. The music calms down and the car pulls up. Another close up of his face reveals that he has vampire fangs and it becomes obvious why he was avoiding the garlic and #8216;cross#8217; road sign. Then a female voiceover reads, #8220;Good news for vampires, all Seat Ibizas have air conditioning instead of a sunroof. Ethics: Argumentative. #8221; While she is saying this, the vampire innocently opens the sunroof and disappears in a puff of smoke. Crossing Essay. This advertisement was better produced than the Fiat Punto commercial.

The website address was clearly visible in the bottom left hand corner all the way through the advert. The colours were very dark and cloudy. Ethics: Argumentative Essay. The car looked out of place in the road with the on lord of the human nature, Horse drawn carriage. It was similar to Ethics: essay, the Punto advert in the way that it had a twist in the tale at the end. The vampire turning into a puff of smoke was very symbolic of good versus evil. Of course it is not good news for vampires that they have air conditioning, but it is in topics for extended fact a clever way of the advertiser making you subconsciously take a mental note.

The music sets an eerie atmosphere right from the beginning. Although it was a generally good advert it did not sell the product very well and afterwards I was left thinking more about the vampire than the car. To improve the advert they could have used a familiar face or celebrity to be the vampire. The third advert I looked at argumentative, was for Lexus motors. It was not advertising one product, but the brand name in general. It starts off with a boy arriving on data gcse coursework, a bike with a bucket of water and a sponge, at a large stately home. He starts to clean the car, which is on the drive.

The car is extremely dirty. The young boy is Ethics: argumentative essay, being very meticulous. He is removing stones from the tire tread and polishing the car badge. The camera shots range from a close up shot of his face to a shot from inside the house. When he has finished, the car look really good and the paintwork glistens in the sun. This shows that the car is well built and is good quality. Topics. He goes and Ethics: argumentative essay knocks on crossing essay, the door and a middle-aged man answers. Ethics: Argumentative Essay. After an uneasy silence the boy gives the man a i?? 5 note for the privilege of cleaning the essays, car and cycles off. Like both of the other adverts it contains a twist at the end. Ethics:. I found it very fun to watch and sold the economics topics essay, product very well.

There#8217;s no music in this advert, just sound effects. This is a pleasant change and makes this more original and catches you attention. I think that the advert is aimed at the richer car buyer, as a wealthy looking man in a big house is shown as the owner of the car. A richer person would feel like they could relate to him. I don#8217;t think they could have improved the advert. All the adverts were very good, and had a twist in the tail. My personal favourite was the one for Lexus. Essay. I think it was well put together and easy to good clinchers, watch.

The other two adverts were both good but could have been a bit shorter. The shorter adverts seemed to essay, stay in my head and were easier to remember. Population growth has its own effects on economic growth of a country, which can be negative or positive first we will look in to the negatively effecting factors of of the human, population growth: 1) Due to Ethics:, increase in Population Consumption Increases, which will decrease, GNP/ GAP and Imports will increase and religious paper Exports Fall down Budget Defect is #8230; Distinction between Microeconomics and Macroeconomics Distinction between microeconomics and Macroeconomics Microeconomics is the study of individual economic units of an economy whereas macroeconomics is the study of Ethics:, aggregates of an economy as a whole. For example, when we study of an individual sugar mill manufacturing sugar, our study is micro analysis but if we study #8230; Introduction Economic sociology is an attempt by sociologists to redefine in sociological terms questions traditionally addressed by economists. It is thus also an answer to attempts by clinchers for essays economists to bring economic approaches in particular utility mastication and game theory to the analysis of social situations that are not obviously related to Ethics: argumentative essay, production or #8230; We are live streaming the Entrepreneur 360™ Conference.

Enjoy main-stage presentations, panel discussions and more.

Custom Essay Writing Service -
Free ethical issue Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe com

contrasts essay THE AMERICAN AND BRITISH. Elsewhere on this web site, I have outlined in some detail explanations of argumentative, both the American political system [click here] and the British political system [click here]. As someone who is intensely interested in politics generally, and British and American politics most especially, I am fascinated by essays flies human the many differences between the political scenes on the two sides of the Atlantic. Inevitably, I am oversimplifying somewhat, but the following differences strike me as instructive. THE CONSTITUTION Perhaps the most fundamental difference between the American and British political systems is the constitution - or the lack of one.

The United States has a written constitution as does the vast majority of nation states. Argumentative. The UK does not have a single document called the constitution but instead its constitutional provisions are scattered over various Acts of Parliament. The American constitution is hard to change and, in current political circumstances, perhaps impossible to essays flies, change in any meaningful respect. The Equal Rights Amendment - which sought to provide equal rights for women - failed and there has been no succesful amendment of the US Constitution - except for one technical measure - since 1971. What for practical purposes constitutes the British Constitution - various Acts of Parliament - can be changed by a simple majority in the legislature.

For instance, the current Coalition Government introduced fixed terms for the House fo Commons by passing the essay necessary legislation. In the United States, political discourse frequently makes reference to the constitution - typically Republicans arguing that Democratic initiatives are 'unconstitutional'. Handling Data Gcse Coursework. Besides the argumentative fact that the compare and contrast poetry UK does not have a constitution as such, it is rare for British politicians to argue that the actions or proposals of their opponents are illegal or ultra vires . In the United States, because of the strict 'separation of the Ethics: essay powers' meaning that nobody can be a member of more than one of the three arms of government, no Cabinet member is essays on lord flies human allowed to be a member of the Congress. In Britain, every Government Minister must be a member of one of the two Houses of Parliament and, if he or she is not already in the Parliament, then he or she is made a peer (that is, a member of the House of argumentative, Lords). Although the and contrast essay poetry American political system has a strict 'separation of the Ethics: argumentative essay powers', members of the essays on lord of the flies human Supreme Court (the judiciary) are nominated by one of the other arms of government (the President) and approved by Ethics: one part of another arm of government (the Senate which is part of the legislature). In the UK, almost all members of the upper chamber of the legislature (the House of for extended, Lords) are effectively chosen by the political party leaders in the lower chamber of the legislature (the House of Commons). THE EXECUTIVE The most obvious - and certainly the most visible - of the differences between the American and Ethics: essay British political systems is handling data gcse that the USA is a presidential system, with the apex of power in essay, a President elected indirectly through an Electoral College, whereas the data gcse UK is a parliamentary system, with the Prime Minister holding office and power only so long as he or she commands a majority of votes in the House of Commons. In theory then, the American President has much more power than the British Prime Minister - he is the commander-in-chief and argumentative essay has the power to and contrast essay poetry, issue executive orders which have the full force of law. However, the constitutional system of 'checks and Ethics: argumentative balances' seriously circumscribes the power of the US President who often finds it really difficult to push legislation through Congress. By contrast, a British Prime Minister usually heads a government with a majority of research paper, seats in the House of Commons and the ability to Ethics: essay, pass almost any legislation that he wishes. In the United States, the transition period between the ruben martinez election of argumentative essay, a new president and that person's inaugration is two and half months.

In Britain, the good for essays changeover of Prime Ministers is Ethics: essay virtually immediate - within hours of the election result, one person leaves 10 Downing Street and within the following hour the successor enters it. A US President is limited by the constitution to two four-year terms in essay poetry, office, whereas there is essay no limit to the time that a British Prime Minister can serve in the office. In the US, government is highly partisan with the President appointing to the executive colleagues who are almost exclusively from handling within his own party. In the UK, government is normally equally partisan with all Ministers coming from the governing party but, in 2010, exceptionally the Conservatives were required to go into a coalition with the Liberal Democrats and grant them 17 ministerial positions. The American Cabinet is appointed by the President but he does not chair it or even attend it. The British Cabinet is appointed by the Prime Minister who normally attends and chairs every meeting. The size of the American Cabinet is fixed: it is the Vice-President plus all the Ethics: argumentative heads of the executive departments making a total of 16. The size of the British Cabinet varies: it is whatever size the Prime Minister wants it to be which is normally around 18, sometimes with a small number of additional Ministers who are not actual members but who are invited to attend on a regular basis.

The American Cabinet meets at irregular intervals and essays on lord of the flies nature acts as adviser to the President. The British Cabinet meets once a week and Ethics: essay formally takes decisions, usually by consensus under the guidance of the Prime Minister. In the United States, the incoming President and compare his aides make a total of Ethics: argumentative, around 7,000 political appointments. In Britain, the Prime Minister appoints around 100 members of the Government and and contrast poetry members of the Cabinet each appoint a couple of Special Advisers, so the total number of political appointments is Ethics: argumentative essay around 150. In the United States, all the most senior appointments are subject to confirmation hearings and votes in essay ruben martinez, the Senate. In Britain, there is no procedural method of challenging the appointment of a particular Minister although, in theory, the Opposition could move a vote of no confidence in the appropriate House of Parliament. In the USA, after the Vice-President the Secretary of Ethics: essay, State is the most senior member of the Cabinet and in essays on lord, many countries would be known as the Foreign Secretary. In Britain, the political head of each Government Department is called Secretary of State and so almost every member of the Cabinet is a Secretary of State. In the United States, the incoming President's inaugural address is a highly public and prestigious affair.

In Britain, the new Prime Minister simply sets out his or her vision for the country in a speech to the House of Commons on the subject of the argumentative essay Queen's Speech which opens the new session of Parliament. In the United States, the President each year gives a high-profile 'State of the Union Address'. Essay Martinez. In Britain, there is essay no equivalent occasion, the compare and contrast poetry nearest event being the Prime Minister's introduction to the Government's legislative intentions for Ethics:, the next year or so after the State Opening of Parliament each session. As a result of the separation of the powers, the US President does not attend or address Congress except for the annual 'State of the Union Address'. Since there is no separation of the powers in good for essays, the UK system, the Ethics: argumentative essay Prime Minister is a member of one of the Houses of Parliament - these days, invariably the House of Commons - and regularly addresses the Commons, most notably once a week for Prime Minister's Question Time (PMQ). When the President addresses Congress, he is given a respectful hearing. When the Prime Minister addresses Pariament, he is barracked and and contrast essay interrupted and Prime Minister's Question Time in particular is a gladitorial affair. THE LEGISLATURE In the USA, both houses of the legislature - the Senate and the House of argumentative essay, Representatives - are directly elected. In the UK, the House of Commons is directly elected, but the House of Lords is largely appointed (making it unique in the democratic world). In the States, as a consequence of the separation of the clinchers powers, all legislation is introduced by a member of Congress, so even the signature legislation attributed to President Obama on healthcare reform was actually introduced by a Congressman (Democratic member of the House of Representatives Charles Rangel). In total contrast, almost all legislation in Britain is introduced by the Government with only a very small number of Bills - usually on social issues with minimal implications for the public purse - introduced by individual Members of Ethics:, Parliament (they are called Private Members' Bills).

Senate rules permit what is called a filibuster when a senator, or a series of senators, can speak for coursework, as long as they wish and on any topic they choose, unless a supermajority of three-fifths of the Senate (60 Senators, if all 100 seats are filled) brings debate to a close by invoking what is called cloture (taken from the French term for closure). There is no equivalent provision for preventing filibustering in either House of the British Parliament but filibustering is Ethics: rare. In both the House of good, Representatives and the Senate, the majority party chairs all committees which have considerable power. In the Ethics: argumentative two chambers of the British legislature, committee chairperships are allocated between the different parties, roughly in for extended essay, proportion to the size of the party in the House, and the committees are much less powerful than in Ethics:, the US Congress. In the essays of the nature House of Representatives, the Speaker - chosen by the members of the largest party - has considerable power and acts in a highly partisan fashion. In the House of Commons, the Speaker - chosen by the whole House - only has procedural responsibilities and acts in a non-partisan manner (usually he is argumentative essay not opposed in a General Election). THE JUDICIARY In America, the Supreme Court is an intensely political institution - its members are appointed by the President on a partisan basis and its decisions are often highly political and highly controversial. By contrast, in Britain the Supreme Court is not appointed on a political basis and, like all British courts, avoids making decisions which it regards as proper to politicians and Parliament.

In the United States, 39 states hold at least some competitive elections to and contrast essay, choose judges. When the country was first created, there were no such elections (Mississippi became the first state to require judicial elections in 1832). In the UK, no judges are elected. Indeed very few countries worldwide have judical elections. Exceptions including Japan and Ethics: essay Switzerland. POLITICAL PARTIES In the the USA, the Republicans are the Right of Centre party and the Democrats are the Left of Centre party.

In the UK, the Conservatives are the Right of Centre party and Labour is the Left of Centre party. However, the 'centre' in American political is markedly to the Right of the 'centre' in British or most of European politics. This means that the policies espoused by Tea Party candidates would not be supported by any political party in Britain, while the economics for extended policies supported by an American politician like Bernie Sanders, the Independent senator from Vermont, would be mainstream in Ethics: essay, the British Labour Party. In the USA, there is good no centre party in this sense of one positioned politically between the Republicans and the Democrats. In Britain, there is a Liberal Democrat Party which ideologically sees itself as between Conservative and Ethics: essay Labour. In the USA, there are only two parties represented in Congress and both are federal parties; there is no political party that only poetry, seeks votes in one state or a selection of states. In the UK, as well as political parties that seek votes throughout the entire country, there are nationalist political parties that field candidates only in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland respectively. In the United States, the Democratic and Republican Parties absolutely dominate federal and state elections with independents securing only small proportions of the vote. In the United Kingdom, the Ethics: argumentative two main political parties - Conservative and Labour - win a smaller and declining share of the total vote, with a growing share being taken by the likes of the Liberal Democrat Party and the UK Independence Party at national level and by the likes of the Scottish and compare and contrast Welsh Nationalist Parties at the devolved level. In American politics, the two main political parties are loose coalitions with individual candidates or Congressmen adopting varying positions on many issues (although, in Ethics: argumentative, recent years, the Tea Party movement has forced Republican politicians to proclaim more consistently conservative positions).

In British politics, all political parties have much tighter rein on the policies promoted by candidates and essays on lord flies nature the voting by elected representatives. Ethics:. (In the House of religious paper, Commons, each week a 'whip' is issued which sets out how the Member of Parliament should vote on each major issue before the legislature that week). The major parties in the USA have a large-scale congress every four years to choose their candidate for the forthcoming presidential election and ostensibly determine the policy platform of that candidate. Ethics:. All the political parties in the UK hold annual conferences where they debate the policy positions to be adopted by the party, but these conferences do not choose the handling data coursework party leader (which is done through a separate and broader process varying from party to argumentative, party). In illustrations and compare promotional material, the Democratic Party is often represented as a donkey, while the Republican Party is featured as an essay elephant - symbols that date back to the 1870s. British political parties regularly change their symbols and very few electors have any idea what they are. ELECTIONS AND CAMPAIGNS In the USA, the term of a President, Senator or Congressman is handling data gcse known precisely as four years, six years and two years respectively and the dates of the argumentative elections are fixed. In the handling gcse UK, the term of members of the House of Commons - and therefore of the Government - is Ethics: essay legally a maximum of nature, five years but traditionally a Prime Minister could call a general election whenever he or she wished and it has been considered 'cowardly' to wait the full five years and so the Ethics: argumentative election has been more typically after around four years. However, the current Coalition Government has enacted legislation to provide for a fixed five-year term except for special circumstances. Candidates for the Presidency, the essay Senate and the House of Representatives - plus a host of other positions below federal level - in the US political system are chosen by a system of primaries in which (usually) all registered Democratic and Ethics: argumentative essay Republican voters participate in the choice of the and contrast poetry candidate for 'their' party in argumentative, the main election. Britain does not have a system of research paper, primaries and the selection of candidates is normally confined to Ethics: argumentative, actual members of the relevant political party in the constituency in question. The filling of vacancies varies between and within the two political systems.

The US Constitution states that special elections will be held to fill vacant Senate seats, but that state legislatures may empower the good clinchers governor of the state to fill the seat by an appointment between the time that it becomes vacant and the time that the winner of the special election is Ethics: certified. Most states allow the governors to pick the replacement who serves until the next general election when the voters decide who will serve the remainder of the term. Several states, however, require that a special election be held with the governor certifying the winner as the data gcse coursework Senate member. By contrast, the Constitution requires that governors call special elections to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives. They are usually held within three-six months of a vacancy because the entire election process must be followed: nominating conventions or primary elections plus a general election. Essay. In the UK, vacancies in the House of religious research paper, Commons are filled by a by-election in the relevant constituency which is usually held within three or four months. Since members of the House of Lords were not elected in the first place, there is no by-election when a peer resigns or dies. The American general election effectively lasts almost two years, starting with the declaration of candidates for the primaries.

The British general election lasts around four weeks. American elections depend on vast sums to purchase broadcasting time. Parties and candidates in British elections cannot buy broadcasting time. As a consequence of the Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case, effectively there are no limitations on expenditure in American political elections. There are statutory limitations on Ethics: expenditure for all elections in the UK. In the States, almost 40 million television viewers watched the Convention speeches of Barack Obama and Sarah Palin in 2008. No party conference speech in Britain would attract more than a few million.

American presidential candidates have been taking part in televised debates since 1960. British political leaders only agreed to and contrast essay poetry, televised debates for the first time in argumentative, the General Election of essays on lord flies human nature, 2010. The first televised debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in 2012 attracted almost 70 million viewers. Even allowing for the difference in population, the televised debates between the British party leaders do not attract the same level of interest. In an Ethics: argumentative essay American presidential election, turnout is typically around 50% (although in the 2008 election it was over 60%) and, in the case of mid-term Congressional elections, turnout typically falls to around 40%.

In the UK, turnout in General Elections used to be around 75% but more recently has fallen to essays flies human nature, around 60%. In the USA, blue signifies states held by the Democratic Party, the more left-wing. In the UK, blue identifies the Conservative Party, the more right-wing. In the USA, red signifies states held by the Republican Party, the more right-wing. In the UK, red identifies the Labour Party, the more left-wing.

In an American general election, the argumentative states that might go to economics essay, one party or the other are known as 'purple states' or 'swing states' or simply 'competitive'. In a British general election, constituencies that might go to Ethics: argumentative, one party or another are called 'marginal constituencies' (where three parties are each in contention - which is not unknown - it is called 'a three-way marginal'). American elections are often so raw and vitriolic that candidates make spurious claims about essays on lord human themselves or their opponents that need to Ethics: argumentative, be analysed for the truth and whole web sites are devoted to fact checking. While British politicians are certainly not beyond exaggeration or obfuscation, they are rarely guilty of the blatant truth-twisting that one sadly sees in the US. American elections routinely involve attack advertisements which denigrate one's opponent in highly personal terms and even presidentual primaries can involve sharply derogatory remarks about one's opponent in economics topics, the same party (witness the Republican primaries of 2016). It is unusual for election material in Britain to attack an opponent in personal terms and virtually unknown in televsion broadcasts (although a recent - and widely condemned - exception was in the London Mayor elections of 2016 when the Conservative candidate highlighted the religion of his Labour opponent).

In the Ethics: argumentative essay United States, certain families have provided a number of very promiment politicians: such as the handling data coursework Kennedys and Clintons for the Democrats and the Bushs for argumentative essay, the Republicans. Good Clinchers. Furthermore a significant number of members of Congress are relatives of someone who has previously served in Congress or high office. Name recognotion is very important in American elections. By contrast, in Britain sons (and sometimes daughters) have followed fathers (or even mothers) into the House of Commons but less frequently and less prominently than is the case in the USA. In British elections, the party is usually much more important than the individual.

STYLE OF POLITICS In America, the term 'conservative' means really right-wing, especially on argumentative social issues. In Britain the name 'Conservative' means mainstream right-wing, especially on economic issues. In America, the good clinchers term 'liberal' generally means quite left-wing. In Britain, the name 'Liberal' means broadly centrist. In the States, it is considered necessary for a politician to emphasize their patriotism.

In Britain, it is assumed that anyone who wants to Ethics: argumentative, run for national office cares for his or her country. In the United States, the economics topics essay flag holds special place in the political heart of the nation, people sing to it while placing a hand over their heart, and Ethics: argumentative essay many people would like to make burning it a criminal offence. In Britain the flag is rarely prominent at political events. In the United States, since 9/11 most politicians wear a pin depicting the stars and stripes. In Britain, no politician would wear a badge displaying the union jack. So many political speeches in the US include the phrase my fellow Americans. In British political terminology, there is simply no equivalent phrase.

In the States, virtually every political speech seems to mention God, especially in the final call God bless America. Compare Essay. In Britain, no politician mentions God and none would think of inviting Him to show a special preference for his or her nation state. In the US, politicians frequently refer to their position on social issues like abortion and Ethics: homosexuality. A British politician would think it unnecessary and inappropriate to talk about such issues unless asked. In the US, politicians constantly talk about the problems and the aspirations of the middle class. In the UK, politicians tend to talk more about the needs of the working class. They mean something similar but the language is different because the perceptions are different. In America, the working class is seen as the poor and most citizens perceive themselves as middle-class or aspiring to be so. In Britain, the good middle-class is seen as a comfortable minority with the majority of the Ethics: essay population perceiving themselves as working class. Although taxes are never popular, the issue of taxation is much more emotive in American politics than in British (or European) politics and the terms of debate on compare taxation are much more hostile. The United States was born in Ethics: essay, a revolt against paying taxes and many Republicans are against any tax increases and believe that low taxation stimulates economic growth, whereas many British (and European) politicians see taxation as a social instrument as well as a fiscal one with the power to bring about redistribution in data gcse, society.

American political speeches do not tend to make much use of facts and Ethics: figures (those of former President Clinton tend to be an exception) but appeal more to data coursework, broad values which do not lend themselves to quantification. Many British political speeches focus on practical issues and use figures to highlight problems and make comparisons with the policies or the performance of Ethics: argumentative essay, one's opponents. In the States, there are currently some outstanding political speakers, led by Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. In Britain, there is no politician who can be so inspirational, although Tony Blair at his best came close (but he's gone). On the other hand, British politicians tend to be better debaters because of the more confrontational style of discussion in the House of crossing ruben martinez, Commons, especially Prime Minister's Questions. In US political theory and discourse, there is a notion called 'American exceptionalism'. There are several versions of essay, this nebulous concept, perhaps the most common being that the United States has a special 'superiority' in the world because of clinchers for essays, its history, size, wealth and global dominance plus the 'sophistication' of its constitution and power of its values such as individualism, innovation and entrepreneurship. Many American politicians refer to the USA being the greatest country on earth or even the argumentative greatest nation in history. Although Britain fairly recently ruled over the largest empire in world history and has other claims to 'greatness' - not least its political system and cultural reach - there is no concept in British political discourse which compares to 'American exceptionalism'. Last modified on 25 August 2017.

If you would like to comment on this essay e-mail me. If you would like me to speak on this subject contact me.

Need Help Writing an Essay? -
The Top 15 Best Ethical Essay Topics You Should Discuss

essay scoring for FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. For your convenience, our Frequently Asked Questions page is divided into argumentative, four parts: Click below on any section or topic that you want to view. Using Holt Online Essay Scoring in the Classroom. How many writing prompts are available? Currently, we have sixty-six prompts available on our live and demo Web sites. We post additional prompts regularly. What types of writing are represented in essay ruben the writing prompts? Writing prompts are available in ten modes: expository/informative, persuasive, how-to, descriptive, writing about literature, writing about nonfiction, and Ethics: narrative (both high school and essays on lord of the flies nature middle school), plus biographical narrative, definition, and cause and effect (high school only). Visit our writing prompts page to essay, view a list of essay ruben, all available prompts.

How are the writing prompts developed? Every year, our development team identifies which prompts and writing modes are most popular with our users. At the argumentative, same time, we review current state writing assessments for newly released writing prompts and religious paper topics changes in scoring rubrics. Ethics: Argumentative Essay. Using this research, we develop prompts designed to best meet our users' needs and to reflect current trends in writing assessment. Can I develop my own prompt using Holt Online Essay Scoring? No.

For each new prompt, the Intelligent Essay Assessor™ (IEA) requires training on hundreds of student essays scored by humans in order to compare essay poetry, learn how to score other essays written on that topic. Only writing prompts that have been reviewed by a writing assessment expert and have gone through a rigorous training process are posted to argumentative, our site. What reports are available to teachers through Holt Online Essay Scoring? Through Holt Online Learning's Web-based Learning Management Center, teachers can organize students' essays and scores by class and by student. And Contrast Essay Poetry. Our system saves every essay submitted by students, listing the time and date each was entered as well as each essay's holistic score.

Teachers can view each essay as well as the holistic and analytic feedback each student received. Argumentative. These reports are available in crossing real time, immediately after students submit their essays. For more information about reporting, visit our classroom management page. How long does it take to essay, score an essay? Most essays are scored within a few seconds. During that time, the essay is flies sent to argumentative essay, Knowledge Analysis Technologies in Boulder, Colorado, where the company's Intelligent Essay Assessor reviews and assigns a score to the essay. Keep in mind that when your school's Internet connection is handling slow or busy, scores may take longer to appear on the screen as the page refreshes. What types of feedback do students receive? Students receive several types of feedback on their essays, including a holistic score and an analytic assessment in each of five different writing traits: content and development; focus and organization; effective sentences; word choice; and grammar, usage, and Ethics: argumentative essay mechanics.

Holt Online Essay Scoring also provides level-specific writing activities to essays on lord flies human, help students revise their writing, interactive model essays for each writing prompt, and special advisories to alert teachers and students to Ethics: argumentative, highly unusual writing styles. To learn more about each, visit our student feedback page. Can students submit the same essay more than once? Students cannot submit identical essays during the same scoring session. This safeguard is in flies place so that students do not waste hits in a teacher's or a district's account. Students can, however, submit as many revisions of argumentative, their essays as they desire. Revised essays are considered brand-new submissions and are evaluated by essays of the human nature our system without regard to previous scores. Can Holt Online Essay Scoring detect plagiarism or inappropriate content? No.

Holt Online Essay Scoring can only evaluate the Ethics:, essay itself and cannot compare essays with other students' writing in the class or with other content. Similarly, our computer cannot determine what different educators might consider appropriate or inappropriate content. How does Holt Online Essay Scoring help students plan and revise their essays? Holt Online Essay Scoring has several types of prewriting activities and tips for handling gcse revision. To help students draft essays, we offer prewriting tips, revision tips, and six different interactive graphic organizers. After submitting an essay, a student also has access to writing activities specifically designed for Ethics: argumentative writers at his or her performance level. In addition, students can view and click on a fully annotated interactive model essay for further writing instruction. All of these features are in addition to the holistic and good clinchers for essays analytic feedback displayed for each essay. To sample these features, visit our demo site.

What is a graphic organizer? Graphic organizers help students visually organize their ideas as a precursor to drafting their essays. Holt Online Essay Scoring offers six different types of Ethics:, graphic organizers: the essay ruben martinez, freeform Web diagram, the cluster diagram, the spider map, the argumentative essay, fishbone planner, the all-purpose planner, and the persuasive planner. Students can choose the diagram or planner that best fits their purpose, type in their ideas, and then print out the essay, completed organizer for review. What is an interactive model essay? An interactive model essay is an annotated high-scoring essay designed to demonstrate—and demystify—techniques used by Ethics: argumentative essay good writers. Every writing prompt has a link to a model essay written in response to that prompt. The models offer clickable headings that highlight thesis statements, conclusions, topic sentences, and other key parts of the essay. Research Paper Topics. Each heading expands into an instructive annotation that discusses the essay, writer's technique and suggests how students might apply the technique to ruben, their own writing. In this way, the model essay not only demonstrates good writing but also shows students how to put effective writing approaches into action. Visit a sample interactive model essay posted on our demo site (Note: Users must have Macromedia Shockwave and Flash Players in argumentative order to view the model essay).

Do my students have to religious topics, type their essays directly into Holt Online Essay Scoring? No. Many students choose to compose their essays in a word-processing program and then copy and Ethics: essay paste them into the Holt Online Essay Scoring interface. Good Clinchers For Essays. If students are importing their work from an e-mail program or across Mac and essay PC platforms, they should be sure that any special characters in the essay (such as em dashes, smart quotes, and ampersands) have been successfully translated before submitting the crossing essay martinez, essay for scoring. Can students save their essays or graphic organizers in Holt Online Essay Scoring? Students cannot save or retrieve their own essays using their student accounts. However, after students submit an Ethics: essay essay for compare essay poetry scoring, their essays are saved in their teacher's classroom manager portfolio. A teacher then may access and view the full text of each student's essay.

Content entered into Ethics: essay, graphic organizers cannot be saved. After students have typed in their ideas, they must print out their organizers for crossing essay martinez review. What are the technical requirements for using Holt Online Essay Scoring? To get the greatest benefit from Holt Online Essay Scoring, HRW recommends that you use a current version of one of the two most common Web browsers: either Netscape Navigator 6.2 or above, or Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 or above. You can download a current version of essay, these browsers by clicking on the links below. Macromedia Shockwave and Flash Players. The model essays on paper, this site require that you use a current version of Ethics: argumentative, Macromedia's Shockwave and Flash Players: Shockwave 8 or above and Flash Player 6 or above. To download these free players, click on the link below. How do I reach Technical Support? Holt, Rinehart and Winston Technical Support can put you in touch with trained support analysts for assistance.

Call, send an good e-mail, or visit the HRW Technical Support Web site. Monday through Friday. 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., CST. About Rubrics and essay Scoring. Can Holt Online Essay Scoring prepare my students for state writing assessments? Holt Online Essay Scoring can provide useful practice for the kinds of essays used in statewide writing assessments. Teachers and students should note, however, that the conditions will not be the same as those that states mandate for writing assessment. The score a student receives on our site should be taken only as an economics evaluation of one practice essay—not as a predictor of performance on any writing test. What scoring rubrics are used? Holt has developed a holistic rubric for each essay mode (expository, persuasive, and so on) posted on our site—and a standard rubric for analytic scoring. Our rubrics draw on argumentative essay, careful research into scoring standards employed in statewide writing assessments all over the country.

The goal is to assess student writing in ways that parallel standardized writing assessments. To view our holistic and analytic rubrics, visit our student feedback page. What is the difference between holistic and analytic scoring? Holistic scoring is an overall score that indicates a student's performance when compared to a specially-designed four- or six-point scoring scale. Of The Human. The criteria used for holistic scoring are topic and purpose; organization; development; content/ideas; and word choice, grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Each of these criteria is Ethics: weighted equally to help determine an overall score. An analytic score is a more specific measure of five writing traits: content and development; focus and crossing essay martinez organization; effective sentences; word choice; and grammar, usage, and mechanics. Ethics:. The student is scored in each of these five traits as having advanced, competent, limited, or emerging ability. Analytic feedback can identify a writer's strengths and for extended essay weaknesses better than a holistic score. Ethics: Essay. For example, if a student's ideas are weak but his or her use of vocabulary is research paper topics strong, he or she might score limited in content and development but advanced in word choice. For more information about holistic and analytic scoring, visit our student feedback page. Are holistic and analytic scores correlated? Each analytic trait is essay scored independently of the holistic score and of other analytic traits.

Therefore, a student's holistic score and good clinchers analytic feedback may vary from one another, sometimes significantly. Ethics: Argumentative. A perceived discrepancy between the holistic and analytic feedback may actually be a useful distinction between a student's overall performance and a student's performance using particular writing skills. Essays Flies Nature. Therefore, although there is usually some kind of relationship between the holistic and analytic feedback, variation between them is also expected because each is assessed separately. Does Holt Online Essay Scoring's rubric align to argumentative, my state's writing assessment rubric? Because our holistic and analytic scoring rubrics were developed to reflect writing assessment standards shared by economics topics several states across the country, your state's writing assessment rubric may vary somewhat in language and emphasis from the Holt Online Essay Scoring rubrics. However, most states' rubrics correlate in part or in whole to ours. In addition, all students are matched by the computer to argumentative, a four- or six-point scoring scale based on which scale their state writing assessment uses (See How does Holt Online Essay Scoring determine whether to score an essay on a four- or six-point scale?). How does Holt Online Essay Scoring determine whether to good clinchers for essays, score an essay on a four- or six-point scale? Most state writing assessments are scored on a four- or six-point holistic scale. To better match a user's own state's rubric, Holt Online Essay Scoring remembers the state the user entered during setup and scores student essays on the scale used by that state. So, for argumentative essay example, a California user will be scored on crossing essay, a four-point holistic scale while a Florida user will be scored on a six-point holistic scale.

The exception to this rule is the holistic scale used for text-based writing prompts. Ethics: Argumentative Essay. Like most state writing assessments, essays written about a reading passage are scored on a four-point scale. How does Holt Online Essay Scoring score essays with highly unusual writing styles? An essay with a highly unique writing style or unusual construction may receive an advisory message along with a score. In addition, essays over economics essay, 1,200 words will receive an advisory about length. If an essay is off-topic, written in argumentative a language other than English, too brief or too repetitive, a written refusal to write, or otherwise incomprehensible, a student will receive an advisory that his or her essay is unscorable. These advisory messages ask the student to discuss the essay and all feedback with his or her teacher to good for essays, ensure an appropriate evaluation of the writing. Does the length of an essay essay affect its score? An essay under 100 words or over 1,200 words will receive an compare and contrast essay advisory from our system. Essay. For essays falling within those boundaries, length is not a criterion for essay scoring.

However, longer responses have more opportunity to demonstrate development of ideas, elaboration, careful word choice, and clinchers for essays so on. The student papers used to train Holt Online Essay Scoring often reflect these practical correlations between length, development, and quality. In this way, length can indirectly influence the way an essay is scored because many of the argumentative, better training papers are well developed and on lord of the nature therefore longer. What if I disagree with a score given by the computer? It is important to remember that the computer system cannot replace what you do as a writing teacher.

The computer does not know your individual grading standards, nor does it know about your classroom or your students and their lives. Rather, the computer knows the assessment standards we have used to develop our scoring rubrics; it knows how previous essays have been scored by assessment experts. Our scoring system cannot and should not replace your vital role in argumentative the assessment of compare poetry, your students' writing. It serves, rather, as a supplement to what you do, giving students another opportunity to practice important writing skills and another form of feedback about their writing. About the Technology Behind Holt Online Essay Scoring. How are essays submitted to Holt Online Essay Scoring evaluated?

Essays submitted to Holt Online Essay Scoring are evaluated by Ethics: the Intelligent Essay Assessor™ (IEA), a software application developed by Knowledge Analysis Technologies (KAT). Ruben. Founded in 1998, KAT developed IEA, its cornerstone product, to argumentative essay, give instantaneous evaluation and feedback on written essays. What is the Intelligent Essay Assessor? The Intelligent Essay Assessor is a powerful Web-based learning tool that has been proven to provide evaluations of written essays as competently as a professional educator. The only essay-evaluation system in which meaning is good dominant, IEA measures factual knowledge, based primarily on semantic content rather than surface features such as word counts, punctuation, grammar, or keywords. IEA also extensively checks of the validity of argumentative, its scoring system. IEA uses Latent Semantic Analysis, a patented technology based on flies, over ten years of Ethics: argumentative, corporate and university research and and contrast essay poetry development. Latent Semantic Analysis is Ethics: essay a sophisticated computer analysis of text.

It assesses the total content of an essay as well as the correlation between the essay's content and that of training essays previously scored by economics for extended essay expert human readers. How is the computer trained to score student essays? Long before a prompt appears on Holt Online Essay Scoring , we collect student papers written for that prompt. Ethics: Argumentative. After collection, these papers are scored—holistically and handling gcse coursework analytically—by experts in writing assessment. Then, the training papers are forwarded to Knowledge Analysis Technologies, where the papers and Ethics: their scores are used to train the computer to score new student essays on the prompt. The computer at KAT learns to recognize how papers differ for each score point on a scoring rubric.

How does the human scoring work? For holistic scoring, our writing experts assess a paper's overall effectiveness, using mode-specific rubrics. For analytic scoring, they examine a paper for five important traits: content and development; focus and on lord of the flies human nature organization; effective sentences; word choice; and grammar, usage, and mechanics. Argumentative. Each essay is scored by two readers for the holistic score and again by two readers for each of the religious paper, five analytic traits. If the two readers diverge on any score, a third reader scores the Ethics:, paper to settle the discrepancy. How does the computer recognize a good essay? The Intelligent Essay Assessor measures the relationship between each word in essay ruben an essay and every other word in Ethics: argumentative the essay. Further, it compares the interrelationship of words in a particular essay with the interrelationship of gcse coursework, words in the training essays.

When a student submits an essay for scoring, the system immediately measures the content and structure of the essay itself; then, it compares the essay to the training essays—looking for similarities—and assigns a holistic score by placing the essay in a category with the most similar training essays. Analytic scoring occurs in much the same way. Ethics: Essay. For each trait, the on lord flies nature, system assesses the student essay, compares it to the training essays, and then categorizes the trait in Ethics: question as advanced, competent, limited, or emerging. How does IEA scoring compare to the way teachers grade writing? IEA's approach is crossing essay martinez designed to mirror the way experienced teachers grade essays. When teachers evaluate a student's essay, they look for characteristics that would identify it as an Ethics: argumentative essay A or C paper, for example. Their expectations are likely based on their previous experience as a grader and on criteria for the assignment in question. In other words, teachers search for research topics a match between the essay itself and the criteria for a particular grade or score. Ethics: Argumentative. The Intelligent Essay Assessor is trained to religious paper, mimic this process. Purchasing Holt Online Essay Scoring.

How much does Holt Online Essay Scoring cost? Holt Online Essay Scoring is Ethics: argumentative sold for $1.00 per hit in batches of fifty hits. How can I purchase Holt Online Essay Scoring? You can purchase Holt Online Essay Scoring online, by mail, or by phone. For more information about online purchases, click on your grade.

To order by mail, download our order form in PDF and gcse coursework follow the instructions on the form.